![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | CLOSING SUBMISSIONS: |
![]() | |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() |
CONCLUSION (s62): 'It is submitted that this case involves victimisation on a scandalous level forcing resignation of an extremely long-serving employee who held the best interests of railway users at his heart. Ultimately, it was his dedication and commitment to railway safety that brought about the victimisation.' |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() |
Closing Submissions > Holden verses Connex South Eastern > |
Home |
![]() |